Main Article Content

Abstract

One of the major causes for the dispersion of missile trajectory is its tip-off from the launcher. Generally low fidelity models are used to predict the tip-off of a missile. One or the other important parameters, like flexibility of missile, flexibility of launcher rail, clearances between launch shoes of missile and launcher rail are omitted in these low fidelity models. In the present study, effects of missile and launcher flexibility on missile tip-off are studied by comparing the results by a low fidelity rigid body simulation model and a 3D finite element model. Predicted tip-off by these two models is compared with ground flight measured data. Effect of omitting one of the launch shoes on missile tip-off is also studied using low fidelity model. For a ground launched missile gravitational pull decides the missile tip-off, but for aircraft launched missiles, aircraft flow field is equally important. Rail phase of an air to air missile is simulated considering varying aircraft flow field, using a full-fledged 3D Finite Element Model.

Keywords

No Keywords.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ismail, S., Jain, P. C., & Anjaneyulu, P. S. R. (2023). Effect of Flexibility and Aircraft Flow Field on Rail Launch Simulation of a Missile. Journal of Aerospace Sciences and Technologies, 68(2), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.61653/joast.v68i2.2016.249

References

  1. Eugene L. FleemaN., "Technologies for Future Precision Strike Missile Systems - Missile/Aircraft Integration", RTO SCI Lecture Series held in Atlanta, USA, March 23-24, 2000.
  2. Khalil, M., Abdalla, H. and Kamal, O., "Trajectory Prediction for Typical Fin Stabilized Artillery", Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Aerospace Sciences and Aviation Technology, ASAT-13, May 26-28, 2009.
  3. Yujun Chen and Yi Jiang., "Dynamic Design Technology of Missile Launch Systems", International Symposium on Information Engineering and Electronic Commerce, 3rd (IEEC 2011), July 22-24, Huangshi, China.
  4. Zbigniew Koruba, et al., "Dynamics of a Controlled Anti-aircraft Missile Launcher Mounted on a Moveable Bas", Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Vol.48, No.2, Warsaw 2010, pp.279-295.
  5. Anandhanarayanan, K., Konark Arora., Vibhav Shah., Krishnamurthy, R. and Debasis Chakraborty., "Separation Dynamics of Air-to-Air Missile Using Grid Free Euler Solver", Journal of Aircraft, Vol.50, No.3, 2013, pp.725-731.
  6. Peter Zeman., "Rail lAunch Missile Simulation Using MSC Nastran Software", Paper 2001-34, MSC World Wide Aerospace Conference-Part I, 2002.
  7. Rhett Shaw and Mark Gillcrist., "Near-miss Shock Response of an Encanistered Vertical Launch Anti-submarine Rocket Carrying a MK54 Torpedo" Journal of Critical Technologies in Shock and Vibration, Vol.2, 2003, pp.1-15.
  8. Hans Wallenius and Anders Lindberg., "Major Improvements in Store Separation Analysis Using Flexible Aircraft", 27th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, ICAS 2010, September 19-24, Nice, France.

Similar Articles

<< < 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.