Main Article Content

Abstract

Numerical simulations are carried out for scramjet combustor with fuel injector struts to evaluate its performance for ground test conditions. Simulations were carried out for non-reacting and reacting flow with equivalence ratio of 1.0. CFD predicted top wall pressure compared reasonably well with experimental results except the upstream (ahead of the fuel injection) regions of the combustor where CFD has predicted higher values compared to the measured values. Effect of various spray distribution and turbulence models on wall pressure distribution and performance of the combustor studied. SST-kw turbulence model has predicted close to experimental data at upstream of combustion compared to k-e, k-w turbulence models. The net calculated combustion efficiency and achieved thrust at exit of combustor are 3% and 2.7% respectively higher in k-w compared to SST-kw though total pressure recovery in all three cases are almost similar.

Keywords

Scramjet combustor; CFD; Spray parameter; Turbulence models.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dharavath, M., Manna, P., & Chakraborty , D. (2023). Effect of Turbulence Model and Spray Parameters on Kerosene Fuelled Scramjet Combustor. Journal of Aerospace Sciences and Technologies, 67(3), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.61653/joast.v67i3.2015.381

References

  1. Curran, E. T., "Scramjet Engines: The First Forty Years", Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol.17, No.6, 2001, pp.1138-1148.
  2. Edward, A. K. and Joseph, A. S., "Liquid Jet Injection into a Supersonic Flow", AIAA Journal, Vol.11, No.9, 1973, pp.1223-1224.
  3. Northam, G. B. and Anderson, G. Y., "Survey of Supersonic Combustion Ramjet Research at Langley", AIAA Paper 86-0159, 1986.
  4. Waltrup, P. J., "Liquid Fueled Supersonic Combustion Ramjets: A Research Perspective of the Past, Present and Future", AIAA Paper 86-0158, 1986.
  5. Abbilt, J. D., Hartfiled, R. J. and McDaniel, J. C., "Mole Fraction Imaging of Transverse Injection in a Ducted Supersonic Flow", AIAA Journal, Vol.29, No.3, 1991, pp.431-435.
  6. Yokota, K. and Kaji, S., "Two and Three Dimensional Study on Supersonic Flow and Mixing Fields with Hydrogen Injection", AIAA Paper No. 95-6024, 1995.
  7. Mitani, T. and Kouchi, T., "Flame Structures and Combustion Efficiency Computed for Mach 6 Scarmjet Engine", Combustion and Flame, Vol.142, No.3, 2005, pp.187-196.
  8. Malo-Molina, F. J, Gaitonde, D.V. and Ebrahimi, H.B., "Numerical Investigation of a 3D Chemically Reacting Scramjet Engine at High Altitudes Using JP8-Air Mixtures", AIAA Paper No. 2005-1435, 2005.
  9. Rajasekharan, A. and Babu, V., "Evaluation of a Ramp Cavity Based Concept Supersonic Combustor Using CFD", Progress in Computational Fluid Dynamics, Vol.9, No.1, 2009, pp.16-29.
  10. Behera, R. and Chakraborty, D., "Numerical Simulation of Combustion in Kerosene Fueled Ramp Cavity Based Scramjet Combustor", Journal of Aerospace Sciences and Technologies, Vol. 58, No. 2, 2006, pp.104-111.
  11. Dufour, E. and Bouchez, M., "Computational Analysis of a Kerosene Fuelled Scramjet", AIAA Paper, 2001-1817, 2001.
  12. Manna, P., Behera, R. and Chakraborty, D., "Liquid Fueled Strut Based Scramjet Combustor Design - A CFD Approach", Journal of Propulsion and Power, 24(2), 2008, pp.274-281.
  13. Javed, A. and Chakraborty, D., "Numerical Simulation of Supersonic Combustion of Pylon Injected Hydrogen Fuel in Scramjet Combustor", Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India), 87, 2006, pp.1-6.
  14. Pannerselvam, S., Thiagarajan, V., Ganesh Anavardham, T. K., Geetha, J. J., Ramanujachari, V. and Prahlada., "Airframe Integrated Scramjet Design and Performance Analysis", ISABE Paper 2005-1280, 2005.
  15. Chandrasekhar, C., Tripathi, D. K., Ramanujachari, V. and Panneerselvam, S., "Experimental Investigation of Strut Based Supersonic Combustor Burning Hydrocarbon Fuel", XVIII ISABE, Beijing, China, September, 2007.
  16. Ramanujachari, V., Chandrasekhar, C., Satya, V. and Panneerselvam, S., "Experimental Investigations of a Strut Based Scramjet Combustor Using Kerosene Fuel", 7th Asia-Pacific Conference on Combustion, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, May, 2009.
  17. Manna, P., Dharavath, M., Sinha, P.K. and Chakraborty, D., "Optimization of a Flight-worthy Scramjet Combustor Through CFD", Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol.27, 2013, pp.138-146.
  18. Malsur Dharavath, Ranjith, A.R., Manoj, R., Manna, P. and Debasis Chakraborty., "Effect of Turbulence Models on Scramjet Combustor Performance with Kerosene Fuel", Paper No. CP-04, 16th Aeronautical Society of India, CFD Symposium, August,12-13, Banglare, 2014.
  19. ANSYS-CFD, Release 11.0: "Installation and Overview", 7th July, 2007.
  20. Launder, B.E. and Spalding, D.B., "The Numerical Computation of Turbulent Flows", Computational Method in Applied Mechanical Engineering, Vol.3, 1974, pp.269-289.
  21. Wilcox, D.C., "Multiscale Model for Turbulent Flows", AIAA Journal, Vol.26, No.11, 1988, pp.1311-1320.
  22. Menter, F.R., "Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications", AIAA Journal, Vol.32, No. 8, 1994, pp.1598-1605.
  23. Lefebvre, A.H., "Atomization and Sprays", Hemisphere publishing Corporation, Bristol, First edition, 1989.
  24. Ramanujachari, V., "Spray Parameters for Different Equivalence Ratios", Private Communication.
  25. ANSYS ICEM-CFD-11, "Installation and Overview", January, 2007.
  26. Shuhei, T., Kazunori, W., Sadatake, T., Mitsuhiro, T. and Michikata, K., "Effects of Combustion on Flowfield in a Model Scramjet Combustor", Twenty Seventh Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, 1988, pp.2143-2150