Main Article Content

Abstract

The objective of the present research is to study the effectiveness of steady and pulsed vortex generator jets in reducing inlet flow distortion and in improving pressure recovery by effective secondary flow control in uniform inflow serpentine duct diffuser. The measurements were carried out at a test Reynolds number of 6.5 x 105 based on the diffuser inlet width. Serpentine duct diffuser consisted of two main portions, namely, a square to circular constant area transition duct followed by a circular diffusing duct. Investigations show that the flow in the serpentine diffusing duct suffers from stall on the inner wall and consequently the outflow at AIP has considerable flow distortion due to the combined effect of secondary flow and the inner wall stall. It is observed that the use of vortex generator jets, both in steady and pulsed modes, improve the performance substantially. The number of jets, location of jets, velocity ratios and the pulse frequency are some of the variables that are studied. The results obtained so far suggest that use of pulsed jet not only gives better performance but also reduces the amount of air that is needed to be injected through the jets in comparison to steady jets for similar velocity ratios.

Keywords

Serpentine duct, flow control, pulse jets.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chandra, S., Keerthi, M., Kushari, A., & Sullerey, R. (2023). Flow Control in Serpentine Inlet Duct Using Vortex Generator Jets. Journal of Aerospace Sciences and Technologies, 64(3), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.61653/joast.v64i3.2012.462

References

  1. Brear, M.J., Warfield, Z., Mangus, J.F., Braddom, C.S., Paduano, J.D. and Philhower, J.S. , "Flow Separation within the Engine Inlet of an Uninhabited Combat Air Vehicle (UCAV)", Proceedings of the 4th ASME/JSME Joint Fluids Engineering Conference, 2003, Honolulu, Hawaii.
  2. Rabe, A.S., "Effectiveness of a Serpentine Inlet Duct Flow Control Technique at Design and Off-Design Simulated Flight Conditions", ASME J. Turbomachinery, Vol.128, No.2, pp.332-339, 2006.
  3. Johnston, J. P. and Nishi, M., "Vortex Generator Jets-Means for Flow Separation Control", AIAA Journal, Vol. 28, No. 6, pp. 989-994, 1990.
  4. Reichart, B.A. and Wendt, B.J., "Improving Curved Diffuser Performance with Vortex Generators", AIAA Journal, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp.65-72, 1996.
  5. Kwong, A.H.M. and Dowling, A.P., "Active Boundary Layer Control in Diffusers", AIAA Journal, Vol.32, pp. 2409-2414, 1994.
  6. Harper, D.K., Leitch, T.A., Ng, W.F. and Guillot, S.A., "Boundary-Layer Control and Wall-Pressure Fluctuations in a Serpentine Inlet", Proceedings of the AIAA/ASME/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, 2000.
  7. Hamstra, J.W., Miller, D.N., Truax, P.P., Anderson, B.A. and Wendt, B.J., "Active Inlet Flow Control Technology Demonstration", Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 104, pp. 473-479, 2000.
  8. Sullerey, R.K., Mishra, S. and Pradeep, A.M., "Performance Improvement of S-Duct Diffusers", ASME J. Fluids Eng., Vol. 124, pp. 136-142, 2002.
  9. Pradeep, A.M. and Sullerey, R.K., "Active Flow Control in Circular and Transitioning S-Duct Diffusers ", ASME, J. of Fluids Eng., Vol. 128, No. 4, pp. 1192-1203, 2006.
  10. Hansen, L. C. and Bons, J. P., "Phase-Locked Flow Measurements of Pulsed Vortex-Generator Jets in a Separating Boundary Layer", AIAA Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 558-566, 2006.
  11. SAE, 1973, "Aerospace Recommended Practices", ARP-1420.
  12. Chandra, S., "Effectiveness of a Serpentine Inlet Duct Control Scheme", M. Tech. Thesis, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, 2008.
  13. Nicoll, W. B. and Ramaprian, B. R., "Performance of Conical Diffusers With Annular Injection at Inlet", Journal of Basic Engineering, Vol. 92, 1970.