Main Article Content

Abstract

Controlled Aerial Delivery System (CADS) consists of Ram Air Parachute (RAP) Airborne Guidance Unit (AGU) and useful payload. AGU pulls the control lines attached to the control surfaces of RAP and provides required maneuverability to the system. Estimation of load on control lines is essential for design and development of Airborne Guidance Unit (AGU). This paper presents the mathematical methods of the estimation of load on control lines the results of which are validated by experiments. The mathematical estimate of the load on control lines was carried out by developing a model similar to the aircraft control surface hinge moment estimation. The mathematical model was incorporated in 9DOF model to arrive at real time load estimation on control lines during inflation and subsequent steady flight condition. Experimental results are obtained during flight trials by using load cells on control lines and current sensor on power line of actuators. The mathematical results are in good agreement with the experimental results. The load on control lines are within 6 to 8% of the suspended load.

Keywords

Ram air parachute, 9DOF, Flap deflection

Article Details

How to Cite
Balraj Gupta, Vipin Kumar, Ravi Krishna, S.C. Upadhyaya, & A.K. Ghosh. (2023). Estimation of Load on Control Lines of Ram Air Parachute Designed for Precise Delivery Using 9-Dof Model. Journal of Aerospace Sciences and Technologies, 63(2), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.61653/joast.v63i2.2011.534

References

  1. Walker, R H., "Static and dYnamic Longitudinal Stability of a Semi Rigid Para-foil", AIAA 70-1191, 1970.
  2. Sobieski, J., "The Aerodynamics and Piloting of High Performance Ram-Air Parachute", May, 1994, (http://www.afn.org/skydive/sta/highperf.pdf.).
  3. Lingard, J. S., "The Performance and Design of RamAir Gliding Parachutes", Precision Aerial Delivery Seminar, Technical Report, Royal Aircraft Establishment, August, 1981.
  4. Lingard, J. S., "Ram-air Parachute Design, Precision Aerial Delivery Seminar", 13th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference, Clearwater Beach, May, 1995.
  5. Peyada, N. K., Ankur Singhal., Ghosh A. K., "Trajectory Modeling of a Parafoil in Motion Using Analytically Derived Stability Derivative at High Angle of Attack", 20th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference, Virginia, May, 2007.
  6. Iosilevskii, G., "Center of Gravity and Minimal Lift Coefficient Limits of a Gliding Parachute", Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 32, No. 6, pp.1297-1302, 1995.
  7. Slegers, N. and Costello, M., "Aspects of Control for a Parafoil and Payload System", Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol.26, No.6, pp. 898-905, 2003.
  8. Prakash, O. and Ananthkrishnan, N., "Modeling and Simulation of 9-DOF Parafoil-Payload System Flight Dynamics", AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit, August 21-24, 2006, Keystone, Colorado.
  9. Barland J. C., Dunker Storm., George Seam and Barber Justin., "Development of Low Cost 10000 lb Capacity Ram Air Parachute", DRAGFLY Program, AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference.
  10. Nathan Slegers and Mark Costello., "Aspects of Control for a Parafoil and Payload System", Journal of
  11. Guidance Control and Dynamics, Vol.26, No.6, November-December, 2003.
  12. Lissaman, P. B. S. and Brown, G. J., "Apparent Mass Effects on Parafoil Dynamics", AIAA 93-1236, 12th RAeS/AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference, 1993.
  13. Brown, G. J., "Parafoil Steady Turn Response to Control Input", AIAA Paper 93-1241, May, 1993.
  14. Iacomini, C. S. and Cerimele, C. J., "Longitudinal Aerodynamics from a Large Scale Parafoil Test Program", AIAA Paper 99-1732, November, 1999.
  15. Etkin, B., "Dynamics of Flight Stability and Control".
  16. Nelson, R. C., "Flight Stability and Automatic Control".
  17. Raymer, D. P., "Aircraft Conceptual Design", AIAA Educational Series, 1992.