Main Article Content

Abstract

Aerospace is seen as a key technology today owing to its growth in Asia in general and India in particular. Indian aerospace scientists and engineers currently working on strategically important projects depend heavily on rapid collection of information from various electronic information resources. Seeking information through e-resources is an upcoming and an endearing activity. The coming of the Internet has totally transformed the way scientific communication has spread among the scientists and engineers in general across the world and more specifically amongst the aerospace scientists and engineers. Aerospace scientists and engineers greatly depend upon the network and Internet technologies for accessing electronic information resources (most importantly electronic journals) related to aerospace engineering right at their desktops. The Indian aerospace scientists and engineers representing the various aerospace organizations in Bangalore belong to different scientific designations or cadres or grades. These designations represent their scientific hierarchy within the organization. As part of an ongoing research, a questionnaire based survey was undertaken to study the association of scientific designations with the ‘Extent of Use of electronic information resources’ and ‘Purpose of the Use of the Internet’. The study has been restricted to the geographic boundary of the city of Bangalore and the selected 16 aerospace Indian organizations. The present analysis is purely based on the 583 responses that were found suitable for the study out of the 625 questionnaires distributed. The responses from the participants towards the ‘extent of use of electronic information resources’ and the ‘Purpose of Use of the Internet’ versus the‘ association of scientific designations’ were graded on a scale of 0 to 4 with 4 representing ‘Most Frequently’. The major findings that the authors would like to report in this paper are: (a) The χ2 test indicates that the different grades (designations) of the aerospace scientists and engineers (Chi-Square = 156.599, P = 0.0438) by the ‘Use of Electronic Information Resources’ have significant association, and ‘Purpose of Use of the Internet’ (Chi-Square = 124.452, P = 0.5722) have no significant association.This implies that percentages of preference for these different grades (designations) of aerospace scientists and engineers by the ‘Extent of Use of Electronic Information Resources’ are not approximately the same and the ‘Purpose of Use of the Internet’ are approximately the same. (b) Hence, the authors infer that the ‘Extent of Use of Electronic Information Resources’ show a dissimilar pattern of use, and the ‘Purpose of Use of the Internet’ show a similar pattern of use amongst the aerospace scientists and engineers with regard to the different designations/grades of the selected 16 aerospace organizations.

Keywords

Aerospace Scientists and Engineers, Electronic Information Resources, Crossassociation analysis, Aerospace Organizations, scientific designations, Internet, Scholarly Communication, Search Engines, Scientific Web Sites, Geographic Boundary of Bangalore

Article Details

How to Cite
R. Guruprasad, Khaiser Nikam, & P. Marimuthu. (2023). A Cross-Association Analysis of Scientific Designations (Grades) With the ‘Extent of Use of Electronic Information Resources’ And the ‘Purpose of Use of the Internet’ Amongst The Indian Aerospace Scientists and Engineers of Bangalore. Journal of Aerospace Sciences and Technologies, 63(3), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.61653/joast.v63i3.2011.538

References

  1. Kling, R. and McKim, G., "Not just a Matter of Time: Field Differences and the Shaping of Electronic Media in Supporting Scientific Communication", Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(14), 2000, pp.1306-1320.
  2. Barjak, F., "The role of Internet in Informal Scholarly Communication", Journal of the American for Information Science and Technology, V57(10), 2006, pp.1350-1367.
  3. Brown, B. Found, C. and McConnell, M., "Federal Science E-Library Pilot: Seamless, Equitable Desktop Access for Canadian Govt. Researchers", Electronic Library, V25(1), 2007, pp.8-17.
  4. Rowland, I. and Olivieri, R., "Journals and Scientific Productivity: A Case Study in Immunology and Microbiology", Publishing Research Consortium Summary Papers 1, Retrieved May 15, 2007, http://www.publishing.ucl.ac.k/papers/2006/Rowl ands_etal.pdf.
  5. Odlyzko, A., "The Rapid Evolution of Scholarly Communication, AT and T Labs - Research", Learned Publishing, 15(1), 2002, pp.7-19.
  6. Gleeson, A.C., "Information Seeking Behavior of Scientists and their Adaption to Electronic Journals", Masters Paper for the M.S. in Library Science Degree, School of Information and Library Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 2001.
  7. Curtis, K. L., Weller, A.C. and Hurd, J. M., "Information Seeking Behavior of Health Sciences Faculty:
  8. The Impact of New Information Technologies", Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 85(4), 1997,
  9. pp.402-410.
  10. Brown, C.M., "Information-seeking Behaviour of Scientists in the Electronic Information Age: Astronomers, Chemists, Mathematicians, and Physicists", Journal of the American Society for
  11. Information Science, 50(10), 1999, pp.929-943.
  12. Garvey, W.D. and Griffith, B.C., "Communication and Information Processing within Scientific Disciplines: Empirical Findings for Psychology", Information Retrieval and Storage, 8, 1972, pp.123-136.
  13. Lancaster, F.W., "Toward Paperless Information Systems", New York Academy Press Inc, 1978.
  14. Hurd, J.M., "Information Technology : Catalyst for Change in Scientific Communication Network",
  15. IATUL Proceedings (New Series), V.6, 1998, CDROM Full Text Database [URL:http://www.
  16. iatul.org/].
  17. Tenopir, C. and King, D.W., "Managing Scientific Journals in the Digital Era", Information Outlook,
  18. V1(2), 1997, pp.14-17.
  19. Tenopir, C. and King, D.W., "Trends in Scientific Scholarly Journal Publishing in the United States",
  20. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 1997, pp.135-170.
  21. Odlyzko, A., "The Economics of Electronic Journals", First Monday, 2(8), 1998, http://www.
  22. firstmonday.dk/.
  23. Walker, T.J., "Free Internet Access to Traditional Journals", American Scientist, 1998, pp.463-471,
  24. http://www.amsciorg/amsci/articls/98articles/walk er.html, http://www.amsci.org/amsci/atricles/98articles/walkerweb.html.
  25. Hanley, K., Harrington, J. and Blagden, J., "Aerospace Information Management (AIM-UK)", Final
  26. Report, Cranfield University Press, Cranfield, 1998.
  27. Vakkari, P., "Trends in the Use of Digital Libraries by Scientists in 2000-2005: A Case Study of
  28. FinELib", Frove, A.(Ed.), Proceedings of the 69th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST), V(43), 2006, http://eprints.relis.org/archive/00008278/
  29. Vakkari, P., "Perceived Influence of the Use of Electronic Information Resources on Scholarly Work and
  30. Publication Productivity", Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
  31. (ASIST), V59(4), 2008, pp.602-612.