Main Article Content

Abstract

The calibration of two multi hole pressure probes with four and five pressure holes are presented at three Mach numbers, viz. M=0.3, 0.4 and 0.5. The calibration was carried out in a subsonic calibration tunnel in yaw angle and pitch angle range of ± 30° at 5° interval. Calibration curves are presented and compared at the three Mach numbers. Calibration data at one Mach number are used as calibration data and calibration data at other Mach numbers are used as measured data to find the flow parameters namely, total pressure and static pressure and flow yaw angle and pitch angle using a lookup table method at these Mach numbers. The interpolation errors are small when the yaw angle and pitch angle range is from -20° to 20° for the four hole probe and from -15° to 15° for the five hole probe. Mach number effects on the flow measurements can be incorporated using the iterative method presented. This method is used to obtain flow parameters in the wake of a steam turbine rotor tip cascade blade. The differences in the obtained values using calibration coefficients at three Mach numbers are found to be negligible.

Keywords

Multi Hole Pressure Probes, Three Dimensional Flow, Compressible Flow, Non-nulling Calibration, Interpolation, Iterative Method

Article Details

How to Cite
Sitaram, N., Yadav Pillala, V. K., Prasad, B., & Purushothama, B. (2023). Calibration of Multi Hole Pressure Probes for Three Dimensional Flow Measurements in Subsonic Flow*. Journal of Aerospace Sciences and Technologies, 75(2), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.61653/joast.v75i2.2023.65

References

  1. Telionis, D., Yang, Y. and Rediniotis, O., "Recent Developments in Multi-Hole Probe Technology", 20th International Congress of Mechanical Engineering (COBEM ’09), Gramado, Brazil, November 2009.
  2. Hoenen Herwart, T., Kunte Robert., Waniczek Phillip and Jeschke Peter., "Measuring Failures and Correction Methods for Pneumatic Multi-Hole Probes", Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2012, GT2012- 68113, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 11-15, 2012.
  3. Everett, K. N., Gerner, A. A. and Durston, D. A., "Seven-Hole Cone Probes for High Angle Flow Measurements: Theory and Calibration", AIAA Journal, 21(7), 1996, pp.992-998.
  4. Sitaram, N. and Venkatesh Babu, M., "Design, Fabrication, Calibration and Validation of Nine Hole Probe for Measurement of Flow with Large Angles", Journal of Aerospace Sciences and Technologies, Vo.69, No.3, 2017, pp.380-387.
  5. Ramakrishnan, V. and Rediniotis, O. K., "Development of a 12-Hole Omnidirectional Flow-Velocity Measurement Probe", AIAA Journal, 45(6), 2012, pp.1430-1432.
  6. Wang, H., Chen, X. and Zhao, W., "Development of a 17-Hole Omnidirectional Pressure Probe", AIAA Journal, 50 (6), 2012, pp.1426-1429.
  7. Sitaram, N., Lakshminarayana B. and Ravindranath, A., "Conventional Probes for the Relative Flow Measurement in a Turbomachinery Rotor Blade Passage", ASME Journal of Engineering for Power, 103(2), 1981, pp.406-414.
  8. Johansen Espen, S., Rediniotis Othon K. and Jones Greg., "The Compressible Calibration of Miniature Multi-Hole Probes", ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering, 123 (3), 2001, pp.128-138.
  9. Haering, Jr. and Edward, A., "Air Data Measurement and Calibration", 1995, NASA TM 104316.
  10. Li Yuhong and Bohn, D., " Numerical Investigation of Dynamic Effects on Unsteady Flow Measurements Using a Two-Dimensional Probe", Tsinghua Science and Technology, 5(4), 2000, pp.395-399.
  11. Houtman E. W. and Bannink, W. J., "The Calibration and Measuring Procedure of a Five Hole Hemispherical Head Probe in Compressible Flow", Report LR- 585, 1989, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands.
  12. Gallus, H. E., and Bohn, D., "Multiparameter Approximation of Calibrating Values for Multihole Probes", Measuring Techniques in Transonic and Supersonic Cascades and Turbomachines, Ecole Polytechnic Federale de Lausanne, Switzerland, 1976, pp.31-37.
  13. Jangir Ravirai., Sitaram Nekkanti and Gajanan, Ct., "A Miniature Four-Hole Probe for Measurement of Three-Dimensional Flow with Large Gradients", International Journal of Rotating Machinery, Vol.2014, 2014, Article ID 297861.
  14. Pillala, V. K.Y., Prasad, B. V. S. S. S., Sitaram, N., Mahendran, M., Biswas Debasish and Jimbo Tomohizko., "A Linear Cascade Tunnel for Flow Investigations of Steam Turbine Rotor Tip Blades in Subsonic Nucleating Flows", SN Applied Sciences, 3, 2021, Article Number 275.
  15. Sumner, D., "A Comparison of Data-Reduction Methods for a Seven-Hole Probe", ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering, 124, 2002, pp.523-527.
  16. Crawford James and Birk A. Michael., "Improvements to Common Data Reduction and Calibration Methods for Seven Hole Probes", ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering, 135, 2013, pp.031206-1 to 031206-6.
  17. Gajanan, Ct., and Sitaram, N., "Reynolds Number Effects on the Calibration of a Subminiature Four Hole Three Dimensional Wake Probe", GTINDIA2014- 8215, ASME 2014 Gas Turbine India Conference, December 5-17, 2014.
  18. Sitaram, N. and Suresh, M., "Reynolds Number Effects on the Calibration Curves of a Four Hole Probe", Paper No. 243, ICTACEM 2014, December 29-31, 2014.
  19. Sitaram, N., Suresh, M., Kumar Satyansh., Dileep Chandran, P. M. and Prasad, B.V.S.S.S., "Look Up Table Method for Five Hole Probe Data Reduction", Journal of Aerospace Sciences and Technologies, Vo.69, No.2, 2017, pp.329-335.
  20. Sitaram Nekkanti and Srikanth Kancherla., Effect of Chamfer Angle on the Calibration Curves of Five Hole Probes", International Journal of Rotating Machinery, Vol.2014, 2014, Article ID704315, 10 pages.
  21. Bakhtar, F., Ebrahimi, M. and Webb, R. A., "On the Performance of a Cascade of Turbine Rotor Tip Section Blading in Nucleating Steam, Part-1: Surface Pressure Distributions", Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs., Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 209, 1995, pp.115-124.
  22. Sitaram, N, Prasad, B.V.S.S.S., Yadav, P.V.K. and Purushothama, B., "Wake Characteristics of a Steam Turbine Rotor Tip Linear Cascade Blade in Subsonic Flow", Indian Journal of Engineering and Materials Sciences, 29 (1), 2022, pp.137-143.