Main Article Content

Abstract

Magnetic actuation utilizes the mechanic torque that is the result of interaction of the current in a coil with an external magnetic field. A main obstacle is, however, that torques can only be produced perpendicular to the magnetic field. In addition, there is uncertainty in the Earth magnetic field models due to the complicated dynamic nature of the field. Also, the magnetic hardware and the spacecraft can interact, causing both to behave in undesirable ways. This actuation principle has been a topic of research since earliest satellites were launched. Earlier magnetic control has been applied for nutation damping for gravity gradient stabilized satellites, and for velocity decrease for satellites without appendages. The three axes of a micro-satellite can be stabilized by using an electromagnetic actuator, which is rigidly mounted on the structure of the satellite. The actuator consists of three mutually orthogonal air-cored coils on the skin of the satellite. The coils are excited so that the orbital frame magnetic field and body frame magnetic field coincides i.e. to make the Euler angles to zero. This can be done using a Neural Network controller trained by PD controller data and driven by the difference between the orbital and body frame magnetic fields.

Keywords

Neural Control, Three Axis Attitude Control, Magnetic Control, Pd Controller, Attitude Stabilization, Attitude Control, Micro-satellites.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sivaprakash, N., & Shanmugam, J. (2023). Neural Network Based Three Axis Satellite Attitude Control Using Only Magnetic Torquers. Journal of Aerospace Sciences and Technologies, 58(2), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.61653/joast.v58i2.2006.708

References

  1. Goel, P. S. and Rojaram, S., “Magnetic Attitude Control of a Momentum-Biased Satellite in NearEquatorial Orbit”, Journal of Guidance and Control, 2(4), 1979, pp. 334–338.
  2. Michele Grassi, “Attitude Determination and Control for a Small Remote Sensing Satellite”, Acta Astronautica, 40(9), 1997, pp. 675–681.
  3. Francois Martel, Parimal Pal, K. and Mark Psiaki, “Active Magnetic Control System for Gravity Gradient Stabilized Spacecraft”, Proceedings of the Second Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, 1988, pp. 1–19.
  4. Keith L. Musser. and Ward L. Ebert, “Autonomous Spacecraft Attitude Control Using Magnetic Torquing Only”, Flight Mechanics/Estimation Theory Symposium, 1989, pp. 23–38, NASA Conference Publication.
  5. John A. Sorenson, “A Magnetic Attitude Control System for an Asymmetric Spinning Spacecraft”, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 8(5), 1971, pp.
  6. –448.
  7. Craig Stickler. and Alfriend, K. T., “Elementary Magnetic Attitude Control System”, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 13(5), 1976, pp. 282–287.
  8. White, J. S., Shigemoto, F. H. and Bourquin, K., “Satellite Attitude Control Utilizing the Earth’s MAY 2006 NEURAL NETWORK BASED 3-AXIS SATELLITE ATTITUDE CONTROL 165 Magnetic Field”, Technical Report NASA TND1068, 1961, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
  9. Rafal Wisniewski, “Satellite Attitude Control Using only Electromagnetic Actuation”, PhD Thesis, 1996, Aalborg University.
  10. Rafal Wisniewski, “Linear time Varying Approach to Satellite Attitude Control using only Electromagnetic Actuation”, AIAA Guidance
  11. Navigation and Control Conference, 1997, New
  12. Orleans, LA.
  13. Marcel J. Sidi., “Spacecraft Dynamics and Control -
  14. A Practical Engineering Approach”, Cambridge
  15. Aerospace Series. Cambridge University Press,
  16. , Cambridge.
  17. James R. Wertz, “Spacecraft Attitude
  18. Determination and Control”, Kluwer Academic
  19. Publishers, 2000, Dordrecht.